Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kitd's commentslogin

Good article.

One of the great things about having an open platform like the Xteink is that it should uncover loads of novel and unsatisfied use cases. Eg, this could be paired with a mobile phone to act as a secondary display much better suited to outdoor applications in bright sunlight.


> open platform like the Xteink is that it should uncover loads of novel and unsatisfied use cases

+1.

And it's worth celebrating the underlying technologies that enable this: ESP32, and RISC-V.

Anyone know what's needed for eink to become cheaper?


working on an daily life ePub generator (because I want to stick to CrossPoint) with the opposite goal, namely use the phone as little as possible, but I admit I would also like to tinker with an additional temporary display, at least for typing

Absolute number of downloads inevitably goes up. Weekly downloads number doesn't.

> Weekly downloads number doesn't.

The ChatGPT app downloads a copy of LibreOffice when you ask it to make pptx files.

So I've downloaded LibreOffice 3 times this week without really paying attention to it.


Ironic since the headline implies that people are downloading it specifically to avoid AI features being shoved into our document editors.

Their point is that weekly downloads may have been on a constant rise for years due to a constant rise in popularity. It's not as constant as absolute number of downloads, but the point is that "breaking record" is still something that's likely happening frequently and doesn't need to be related to any statement they gave. They don't share any numbers, at least in the post.

> In one week, the installer was downloaded more than 1 million times — not counting updates via Linux distribution repositories.

Either there's 1m people downloading new software "because no ai", or there's another popular thing that installs this, and is not counted in the "updates via linux repos". One is much much more probable than the other.


> or there's another popular thing that installs this

Yeah, an AI tool:

The ChatGPT/Codex app bundles a full copy of LibreOffice

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49527396


and the bundled copies will contribute to installer download statistics?

You underestimate the public's hatred of AI-in-everything. HN is a bubble of AI.

I fully expect the bubble is the people in tech who have strong feelings about the goodness or badness of AI one way or another.

Yeah, the ones that know obvious slop and won't ship it are the ones who will win. Unfortunately it seems like I'm stuck with the other half at my current job.

Disliking clunky autocomplete is very different from going out of your way to replace Word with Libre Office. The average office worker will tolerate ten bad assistants before they voluntarily deal with ODF formatting quirks in a corporate environment

Global population is still rising. In general you should expect numbers to go up.

Unless they're is a negative force, such as people being put off by the lack of AI features. While a lack of such a response might not justify the headline used here, I think it is certainly worth noting.

If you know absolutely nothing, though: expect usage of something used by humans to scale with the number of humans.

Yes. But in this case as there has been a recent announcement that could be significant, the trend continuing has some significance because it means the announcement likely⁰ had no detrimental effect¹.

We don't know absolutely nothing here: there is a new variable in play and this result gives us some evidence of the effect of that.

--------

[0] It _could_ have done, but something else countered it, though this is less likely according to Occam's razor.

[1] As opposed to reducing interest in the tools. The figures² apparently don't look to support an increase in interest though.

[2] Going by what others here are saying. The linked text doesn't state any numbers, nor does the announcement from the LibreOffice project, and I don't have time to go digging further ATM.


> Google and Facebook fucked up the internet.

I'd say advertising has fucked up the Internet. Everything they (and plenty of others) have done has been to collect and sell personal data to advertising brokers.


Facebook and Google are probably two of the biggest players when it comes to how online advertising has been shaped.

And advertising eventually fucked up google (the company)

> I'd say advertising has fucked up the Internet

Nothing wrong with honest advertising per se..... back in the day we bought computer magazines mainly for the adverts.

Rather, the problem is the SV AdTech industry which seeks to track me, invade my privacy at every opportunity and is busy sniffing my knickers trying to work out if I'm pregnant so they can sell me more shite.

One observes the FUD those employed by AdTEch are spreading on here about the GDPR; a bunch of people whose very salaries are dependent on abusing our privacy.


The problem was that the Internet allowed for the "innovation" of tracking users to send specific ads to them. And it wasn't made promptly illegal. That's all it took

A lot of IBM customers have moved to RH Openshift and running their java there.

Fun fact: I searched for Kobo Clara on Amazon, and the algorithm has labelled it "Amazon's choice". A subtle agreement with you maybe :)


Apache is just an umbrella organisation for managing open source software projects. There's nothing that links those projects otherwise.


Isn't that just "the World Wide Web"?

The reason these sites require login is because they also want to control the resulting conversations, whether for moderation (generous) or selling your data (more likely).

Announcements/political campaigning doesn't require feedback in the same way so no reason for them to use X, FB or anything else.

Seeing the state of most conversations on X or FB, I'm quite happy with limiting the general public's ability to broadcast to the world.


Eckel also did "Thinking in C++"

https://amzn.eu/d/03uSE3im


Love it! But shouldn't that be "high results/complexity ratio"?


Depends on if the journey and not the destination is what's important to you. ;)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: