Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jchook's commentslogin

Warren was a 1980s Republican who did legal work on behalf of major corporations including Big Oil vultures.

She stayed in the race for Super Tuesday in 2020 rather than consolidating the progressive vote for Sanders.

Right before, her campaign accepted millions in funding from billionaires after promising not to. Her comment was roughly, as soon as others stop taking billionaire money, I will stop.


A materialist might imagine consciousness is made up of constituent parts, like the organs of perception and the cells that make up those organs.

So perhaps you are a constituent part of the larger consciousness, and you feel your part of it (e.g. your roles and relationships in society)


From my understanding Chinese companies are pushing for open global cooperation on AI, as well as Meta.

Only the US sees this as a competition, new space race, Cold War, etc.


So effectively, trying to undercut their competitor to reduce its wealth and power?

The first part of the article reads like Z.AI is trying to get their piece of the “national security concern” pie.

The way these “AI is too powerful now” articles read about Mythos, Fable, GLM, etc is completely incongruent with my experience using them. It feels like they are all trying to position themselves to influence government policy.


I mean, why don't you ask them for unfiltered models and a few billion tokens?

Never going to be able to see “PNG” written again without secretly thinking “Papua New Guinea” in my mind.

I submit Jean-Paul Gaultier for your consideration.

I typically see the exact opposite problem when giving Claude the reins on a large undertaking.

Claude will, without prompting, break the implementation into 6 phases, and write AI slop “code as English” specs for each phase, each one with glaring errors and unintelligible terse jargon. It will review them all several times with major findings every time and tons of design churn…

Then it will implement a total heap of garbage over many hours of many agents, despite it working in “lanes” and in parallel, and with regular input needed.

Just thousands and thousands of lines of junk, which auto review then plays whack-a-mole to polish and fix. All the while it is able to see the errors and edge cases, yet fails to see the key architectural blunders that led to them in the first place.

I’ve had to fully rethink my approach to LLM tasks like this. For example, for library-esque modules, I have found that isolating the problem outside of the codebase is one useful approach. Something about the lack of noise. It can land on a cleaner solution that can be retrofitted.

I also find that asking it to implement end to end in one fell swoop with a very high level plan actually saves time and creates a cleaner result.


Seems like high-risk and low-reward for your network security. You could host it behind the WG interface, but… still exposing the castle’s master key to a python web app.

I have found that WG client management is as simple as a couple scripts and a TSV file to match pubkeys to users.

Anyhow, cool project and I like the overall concept of respecting existing config.


Well, I don't rely on tools to deliver security out of the box without me knowing what is all about. Therefore, this tool is not meant to be secure by itself. I use other means to achieve that.


I’ve used a few of the hosted VM options for this like Coder and really dislike having to do my work in a web browser.

This is why I made ParaSpace (https://paraspace.dev/)

With ParaSpace I can use a real terminal and my normal tooling to develop locally on fast booting isolated containers. I even get to bring my own dotfiles.


You have to enjoy this article from the perception of its time.

For example #1, the idea of a central codebase + many deploys was not always the way folks did things lol.

The (2025) date must not be correct…


It's not this came out in 2012 when Heroku was The Way to run SaaS apps


I was confused at first, thinking this was going to be an updated version of the original.


I wonder why Epstein was communicating with 4chan's founder in 2011...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: