If I were to hear about it and google it, I’d first search “ink” and then admonish myself for the useless search. If I then searched “ink web” I’d get the React thing. I am not invested in this project. I might stop there.
If I search “ink deploy” I get docs for deploying a different project than the two being discussed, and the second search result is a thread about THIS Ink on HN three days ago. So it’s not impossible to find, but if the necessary differentiation is built into the name they’ll improve discoverability.
Their domain already provides that differentiation. Call it ML Ink. That search brings up their site as the first result.
And the fact is that there's been some level of security since the 1970s or thereabouts after a fair number of hijackings. Any serious debate is about restrictions around liquids/knives/etc. (Some of which related to isolated incidents like the shoe bomber and others of which seem like pretty clear overreach--like I can't bring a hiking pole in carryon.)
On a more philosophical level php is this feature. At least as it was used originally and how it's mostly used today. PHP was and is embedded in html code. If you have a look at a wordpress file you are going to see something like this:
>Our AI industry web traffic analysis is based on estimated data from reliable sources such as SEMrush and Ahrefs. We track 10,500+ AI tools across 171 categories, updating data every month. We analyze total visits, unique visits, user demographics, and more across the categories to provide insights into the AI industry’s size, trends, and top performers.
>Unique visits represent cumulative monthly counts, meaning returning users in different months are counted again. The total unique visits for all tools combined do not represent distinct individuals due to user overlap across multiple AI tools. For a closer estimate of the AI industry's audience size, refer to the latest month's unique visit count.
https://openai.com/index/cerebras-partnership/
reply