Sure, but we’ll never know what they do or if it is innovate because we won’t know what they do.

Will admit that I haven’t read it yet, just saw the crazy number of authors and think this may compete for one of the papers with the most authors.

This one [0] about the Higgs boson is hard to beat. Pages 25-32 are just full of around 5150 „authors“, pages 33-37 are their affilliations.

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7214

Even without that particularly special case, high-energy physics collaborations have long since broken the idea of authors. There are now many collaborations with hundreds of authors publishing regularly and quite a few that are into the thousands.

I like it, represents science's general 'standing on the shoulders of our precedents' far more realistic then the 'genius solo' PR mythos.

I think the number is ~2930 authors according to the CDS [1] which is comparable to the corresponding CMS paper which has about ~2900 authors [2]

[1] https://cds.cern.ch/record/1471031

[2] https://impact.ornl.gov/en/publications/observation-of-a-new...

how do you even keep up with the amount of research coming out these days

I would kind of disagree for personal projects like that. If it’s such a personal project with your young-in, shouldn’t the journey be the treasure? Also, with vibe coding out, custom vibe software/games, and already a lot of games, I would hope you’re not looking for a pay day.

You mean artificial intelligence? Where did super intelligence come from?

*cite a research paper or something

It’s not just about the money, it could also be about being a perfectionist. Going that extra mile.

If only this tool came out before I discovered the ballerina programming language (https://ballerina.io/). Otherwise I am inline with the language <-> uml like definition ballerina statically provides without llm usage.

Expecting vscode to police every single dev using it instead of a company is bananas.

Would you rather not know if what you read is llm generated? I would rather like to know if a book was written by an llm, and em dashes (or similar) will only be apparent for some models for some time.

Yes, and you can also just… create content without AI if you don’t want watermarks on it.

Perfect, I’m glad we’re both for these watermarks.

Let me just get my tens of thousands of dollars I have waiting around to get a few sparks.

Still better then Microsoft.

I've never had Microsoft read a message, initiate an AI generation, then attempt to inject that into my conversation.

Not to say they wouldn't try...

You don't use Outlook I take it.

They’re too busy taking screenshots of your desktop every 2 seconds to datamine your interests in order to sell ads injected into the start menu.

The very lowest bar that ever existed.

Among popular OSs with mainstream app support, there’s only macOS and windows (and chromeOs I guess?). So you’re right, the lowest bar in a competition between two.