Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | anthk's commentslogin

Is pigz faster?

My CRT did 1024x768@85 just fine.

Does Windows NT have a Windows 9x API emulator?

Windows NT predates Windows 95 for two years.

And yes it did had emulators for Windows 16, and DOS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_DOS_machine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_on_Windows


If you squint a bit (well, a lot really), Win32S on 3.1 and Windows 95’s Win32 implementation are Windows NT emulators running on top of 16 bit Windows.

Windows NT doesn't emulated Windows, it is Windows. Wine is not Windows and emulates Windows.

It is windows today, but in the beginning the two were incompatible different products.

Wine Is Not (an) Emulator

Yet, it emulates windows and is a windows emulator.

No, it's a Win32 implementation for Unix.

In Spain an aircon ad in TV joked by telling the viewer that "silence" in Japanese it's "Fujitsu".

PPC was great with the G4, it was much better than the P3. Intel with P3 based-Core Duos won against the G5.

Core solo/duo was the last in the P3 heritage (but that heritage itself traced all the way back to the Pentium Pro initially) via the 2 generations of Pentium-M (even if Core2 had parts they were 64bit so more of a major upgrade).

Whoever convinced the execs at Intel to put Pentium-M into production as a "mobile" chip really saved them when NetBurst reached it's end of line, I owned a first-generation Pentium-M laptop and it was really superb (seeing the Macbook Air introduced was a big meh).

It was really a turning point though, I remember posting some compile time and people didn't believe me, but the Pentium-M chips were good at compiling (since compilers are kinda "branchy" when it comes to execution in a way P4 didn't "like") but also because I had maxed out the RAM on the machine (1.25gb when 256mb was the base for the machine and similar for many desktops) so much of the code and libraries could be retained in disk caches.

With portable performance like that, why do you need a desktop?


Now dive down into Math with Penrose and David Bohm with the implicate order.

Quite independently of the Mathematics, Bohm's ideas of "Implicate and Explicate Order" are very interesting and comprehensible by the layman at a high-level - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order

In particular, students of Hindu Philosophical Schools will find lots of parallels here. Bohm was heavily influenced by Jiddu Krishnamurti which inspired his take on quantum theory.

Bohm also wrote a great book, "Quantum Theory" based on the Copenhagen Interpretation which contains separate parts on "Physical Formulation" and "Mathematical Formulation" of quantum theory.


Great answer.

One of the best perf tests for C# it's to run the Switch emulator against some legal Switch demo game dump.

I had an Athlon XP with a GF2 and Max Payne and Deus Ex played great.

With Lisp you can use iterative algos and get that under a second too. SBCL can be ridiculously fast; and if you optimize the compilation for integers... the speed gets really close to your solution.

I did factorials even under KLISP 23 with cons cells as fake integers:

https://t3x.org/klisp/22/index.html

Dog slow but the old n270 netbook (32 bit) handles big factorials >20 fine, and OFC it's instant under Common Lisp (SBCL) and Scheme (both S9 and Chicken).


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: